In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/kexec: add a sanity check on previous kernel's ima kexec buffer When the second-stage kernel is booted via kexec with a limiting command line such as "mem=<size>", the physical range that contains the carried over IMA measurement list may fall outside the truncated RAM leading to a kernel panic. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff97793ff47000 RIP: ima_restore_measurement_list+0xdc/0x45a #PF: err
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/kexec: add a sanity check on previous kernel's ima kexec buffer
When the second-stage kernel is booted via kexec with a limiting command line such as "mem=", the physical range that contains the carried over IMA measurement list may fall outside the truncated RAM leading to a kernel panic.
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff97793ff47000
RIP: ima_restore_measurement_list+0xdc/0x45a
#PF: error_code(0x0000) – not-present page
Other architectures already validate the range with page_is_ram(), as done in commit cbf9c4b9617b ("of: check previous kernel's ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds") do a similar check on x86.
Without carrying the measurement list across kexec, the attestation would fail.
왜 이 VPI인가 (설명가능 · 실험적)
VPI 산정 기준
| 영향도 | 55.00 |
| 악용 신호(추가 악용신호 없음) | ×1.00 |
| VPI | 55.00 |
VPI 공식 vpi-v1 기준