In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: power: supply: goldfish: Fix use-after-free in power_supply_changed() Using the `devm_` variant for requesting IRQ _before_ the `devm_` variant for allocating/registering the `power_supply` handle, means that the `power_supply` handle will be deallocated/unregistered _before_ the interrupt handler (since `devm_` naturally deallocates in reverse allocation order). This means that during removal, there is a race condition where
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
power: supply: goldfish: Fix use-after-free in power_supply_changed()
Using the devm_ variant for requesting IRQ before the devm_
variant for allocating/registering the power_supply handle, means that
the power_supply handle will be deallocated/unregistered before the
interrupt handler (since devm_ naturally deallocates in reverse
allocation order). This means that during removal, there is a race
condition where an interrupt can fire just after the power_supply
handle has been freed, but just before the corresponding
unregistration of the IRQ handler has run.
This will lead to the IRQ handler calling power_supply_changed() with
a freed power_supply handle. Which usually crashes the system or
otherwise silently corrupts the memory...
Note that there is a similar situation which can also happen during
probe(); the possibility of an interrupt firing before registering
the power_supply handle. This would then lead to the nasty situation
of using the power_supply handle uninitialized in
power_supply_changed().
Fix this racy use-after-free by making sure the IRQ is requested after
the registration of the power_supply handle.
왜 이 VPI인가 (설명가능 · 실험적)
VPI 산정 기준
| 영향도 | 78.00 |
| 악용 신호(추가 악용신호 없음) | ×1.00 |
| VPI | 78.00 |
VPI 공식 vpi-v1 기준