CVE-2026-58438

Details

RemoveDependency in routers/web/repo/issue_dependency.go takes a removeDependencyID form parameter identifying the other issue by its global numeric ID, and fetches it with issues_model.GetIssueByID(ctx, depID) - no repository or permission check at all. It then calls issues_model.RemoveIssueDependency(ctx, ctx.Doer, issue, dep, depType) (models/issues/dependency.go), which deletes the dependency join row and then writes a comment referencing the removal, attributed to the calling user, onto the dependency record.

The sibling function in the very same file, AddDependency, does this correctly when the two issues are in different repos (which ALLOW_CROSS_REPOSITORY_DEPENDENCIES, on by default, permits):

if issue.RepoID != dep.RepoID {
  if !setting.Service.AllowCrossRepositoryDependencies { ... }
  depRepoPerm, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, dep.Repo, ctx.Doer)
  if !depRepoPerm.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(dep.IsPull) {
    return // you can't see this dependency
  }
}

RemoveDependency has no equivalent block at all - it goes straight from resolving dep by ID to deleting the link, regardless of which repo dep lives in or whether the caller can see it. I confirmed this same code is present in the current latest release, v1.26.4.

PoC

Prerequisites: an account with write access to issues on some repo ownerA/repoA, and the global numeric issue ID of an issue in a private repo repoB that is (or was) legitimately dependency-linked to one of the attacker's issues in repoA (cross-repo dependencies are commonly used between related public/private repos, and ALLOW_CROSS_REPOSITORY_DEPENDENCIES defaults to enabled).

curl -s -b "gitea_session=$ATTACKER_SESSION_COOKIE" -X POST \
  --data-urlencode "removeDependencyID=<repoB_issue_global_id>" \
  --data-urlencode "dependencyType=blockedBy" \
  "https://TARGET_HOST/ownerA/repoA/issues/N/dependency/delete"
# Expected: the dependency link is deleted and a "removed dependency" comment
# authored by the attacker is added to the repoB issue, even though the
# attacker has no read access to repoB.

Impact

This is a cross-repository IDOR / broken access control issue. An attacker can tamper with issue-tracking state (dependency relationships) and inject an attacker-authored comment into a private repository they cannot otherwise read or write to, crossing a trust boundary the "add" path explicitly enforces. Impact is bounded - it requires an existing dependency link and discloses no repository content - but it is a genuine unauthorized-write primitive across a private-repo boundary.

Fix

Add the same cross-repo permission check used in AddDependency (access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, dep.Repo, ctx.Doer).CanReadIssuesOrPulls(dep.IsPull)) to RemoveDependency before allowing the deletion to proceed when issue.RepoID != dep.RepoID.

If possible, please apply for a CVE number when publishing. I would greatly appreciate it.