OpenList: Search metadata/count disclosure via Non-Separator-Aware Path Check in Bleve Search
An authorization bypass and information disclosure vulnerability exists in the search API of Openlist. Due to a non-separator-aware path check and unfiltered backend counting, a low-privileged user can bypass their assigned BasePath restrictions to discover and access metadata of files residing in unauthorized sibling directories.
This vulnerability stems from two combined logic flaws when the bleve search engine is utilized:
Insecure Path Prefix Validation: In the search handler (server/handles/search.go), the application attempts to restrict search results to the user's allowed namespace using a simple prefix check: strings.HasPrefix(node.Parent, user.BasePath). Because this function is not path-separator aware, a user with a BasePath restricted to /base will successfully pass the authorization check for a completely separate directory named /base2 (since "/base2" starts with "/base").
Unfiltered Total Count Leakage: The bleve backend (internal/search/bleve/search.go) searches the index globally and ignores the req.Parent boundary. Even if the application later successfully filters out unauthorized items from the Content array (e.g., via CanAccess meta password checks), it still returns the raw Total count provided by the search backend. This allows an attacker to perform blind data-enumeration, confirming the existence of sensitive files outside their namespace by observing the Total count.
Prerequisites:
bleve. Build the index./base and /base2./base2/secret_financial_report.pdf.Base path to /base.Exploitation Steps:
POST /api/fs/search HTTP/1.1
Host: <your-openlist-host>
Authorization: <test-user-token>
Content-Type: application/json
{
"parent": "/",
"keywords": "secret",
"page": 1,
"per_page": 20,
"scope": 0
}
strings.HasPrefix("/base2", "/base") == true), the metadata for secret_financial_report.pdf will be leaked in the response Content.
This is an Information Disclosure and Horizontal/Vertical Privilege Escalation vulnerability. Any authenticated user can enumerate hidden infrastructure, verify the existence of sensitive files (e.g., passwords, internal documents), and extract file metadata across the entire storage namespace, completely defeating the BasePath isolation mechanism.
왜 이 VPI인가 (설명가능 · 실험적)
VPI 산정 기준
| 영향도 | 43.00 |
| 악용 신호(추가 악용신호 없음) | ×1.00 |
| VPI | 43.00 |
VPI 공식 vpi-v1 기준