Gitea: Cross-repository label-ID enumeration oracle via unscoped DeleteIssueLabel API
The API endpoint DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/labels/{id} loads the label by ID with a global,
unscoped lookup and never verifies the label belongs to the URL's repository (or its owning organization). Because
the response status differs by whether the label ID exists anywhere on the instance (204) versus not (422), an
authenticated user can use the endpoint as a cross-repository label-ID existence / enumeration oracle, including
for labels in repositories and organizations they cannot access.
DeleteIssueLabel resolves the label with a global loader and never checks its scope:
// routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go (DeleteIssueLabel)
label, err := issues_model.GetLabelByID(ctx, ctx.PathParamInt64("id")) // global, unscoped
GetLabelByID (models/issues/label.go) is e.ID(labelID).Get(l) with no repo_id / org_id filter. The
handler never verifies label.RepoID == ctx.Repo.Repository.ID (nor the org-label equivalent), and the downstream
issue_service.RemoveLabel (services/issue/label.go) only re-checks the doer's write permission on the issue's
own repository — never that the label belongs to it.
Every sibling label handler is correctly scoped — GetLabel / EditLabel / DeleteLabel (repo and org) use
GetLabelInRepoByID / GetLabelInOrgByID and return 404 for a foreign ID. DeleteIssueLabel is the only outlier.
Why it is only an oracle: deleteIssueLabel (models/issues/issue_label.go) deletes the issue_label row keyed
by (issue.ID, label.ID). For a foreign label, no such row exists → the function returns early before any
mutation or comment creation. So there is no cross-repo write and no leak of the label's name. But the HTTP status
differs:
ErrLabelNotExist)Label IDs are sequential auto-increment, so this enumerates the instance-wide label population and probes existence of specific IDs across tenant boundaries.
Verified end-to-end on a build of the v1.26.3 tag.
alice (private repo alice/secret) creates a label → internal id 1.bob (separate user; public repo bob/pub with issue #1; no access to alice/secret) holds a token
with write:issue on his own repo.bob DELETE /api/v1/repos/bob/pub/issues/1/labels/1 -> HTTP 204 (alice's PRIVATE label id exists)
bob DELETE /api/v1/repos/bob/pub/issues/1/labels/99999999 -> HTTP 422 (no such label)
Differing only by the label ID: 204 vs 422 distinguishes "label ID exists" from "does not exist." bob has zero rights to alice/secret but can still learn label id 1 exists. (Alice's label is untouched — no write.)
Reproduction steps:
alice, bob. As alice, create a private repo and a label on it (note the label id from
the API response).bob, create any repo with an issue, and a token with write:issue.curl -u bob:$T -X DELETE https://<gitea>/api/v1/repos/bob/pub/issues/1/labels/<alice_label_id> → 204.curl -u bob:$T -X DELETE https://<gitea>/api/v1/repos/bob/pub/issues/1/labels/99999999 → 422.bob cannot otherwise see is the oracle.Cross-tenant authorization-key bypass producing a label-ID existence/enumeration oracle: an authenticated user can determine whether arbitrary label IDs (including in private repositories and organizations they cannot access) exist, and enumerate the instance-wide label population.
Scope the loader like every sibling handler, returning 404 for a label that is not in the URL repository (or its owning organization), so the status no longer distinguishes existence:
// routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go — in DeleteIssueLabel, after loading the label
if label.RepoID != ctx.Repo.Repository.ID && label.OrgID != ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID {
ctx.APIErrorNotFound()
return
}
(Equivalently, resolve via GetLabelInRepoByID and, for org repositories, also accept the repo owner's org labels —
mirroring the scoping in GetLabel/EditLabel/DeleteLabel.)
为什么是这个 VPI(可解释·实验性)
VPI 计算依据
| 影响度 | 27.00 |
| 利用信号(无额外利用信号) | ×1.00 |
| VPI | 27.00 |
VPI 公式 vpi-v1