In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: Do not re-initialize smc hashtables INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&smc_v*_hashinfo.ht) are called after smc_nl_init(), proto_register() and sock_register(). This can lead to smc_v*_hashinfo.ht being reset even though hash entries already exist and are being used, possibly resulting in a corrupted list. Remove unnecessary and dangerous re-initialisation of smc_v*_hashinfo.ht in smc_init(); it is implicitly initialised to zero anyho
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/smc: Do not re-initialize smc hashtables
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&smc_v_hashinfo.ht) are called after smc_nl_init(), proto_register() and sock_register(). This can lead to smc_v_hashinfo.ht being reset even though hash entries already exist and are being used, possibly resulting in a corrupted list.
Remove unnecessary and dangerous re-initialisation of smc_v*_hashinfo.ht in smc_init(); it is implicitly initialised to zero anyhow. Add HLIST_HEAD_INIT to the definitions for clarity.
为什么是这个 VPI(可解释·实验性)
VPI 计算依据
| 影响度(默认值（无数据）) | 55.00 |
| 利用信号(无额外利用信号) | ×1.00 |
| VPI | 55.00 |
VPI 公式 vpi-v1